How the man who scaled Sears turned his fortune into nearly 5,000 schools, then made it disappear on a deadline.

This bio is a companion to Chicago Episode 4: The Catalog Kings. That episode tells the story of how Richard Sears and Aaron Montgomery Ward turned the mail-order catalog into the infrastructure of the American consumer economy between 1872 and 1913.

Also available on Spotify & Apple Podcasts.

In October 1874, a twelve-year-old boy worked the crowd at the dedication of Abraham Lincoln's monument in Springfield, Illinois, selling commemorative pamphlets. He earned $2.50 that afternoon (~$70 today) and shook the hand of President Ulysses S. Grant. What he remembered six decades later was not the president. It was the gloves. "I was particularly impressed because he had on yellow kid gloves," he recalled. "He was the first man I ever saw who wore kid gloves."

The boy was Julius Rosenwald, and he had grown up a block from Lincoln's home, the son of a German-Jewish clothier who sold suits out of a Springfield storefront. He would go on to build the most valuable retailer on earth. He would also do something the builders of almost no other great American fortune attempted. Andrew Carnegie carved his name into libraries. John D. Rockefeller chartered an institute to run forever. Rosenwald wrote a rule requiring his foundation to spend every dollar of its principal and shut its doors within twenty-five years of his death, argued in print that perpetual endowments were a mistake, and then declined to let Chicago name its great science museum after him.

The fortune was the easy part. A fortune is only useful for as long as it is moving, and the rarest discipline in capital is not making it, or even giving it away, but engineering it to disappear on a schedule. Rosenwald went one step further than that. On the way in, he made nearly every dollar a condition that forced other people to put up money beside him; on the way out, he built the vehicle that held his fortune to spend itself empty. He spent thirty years learning that discipline inside a mail-order machine, and the rest of his life proving it. He did not work alone. He never did. The way to understand him is through the people he was tied to.

Rosenwald did not found Sears, Roebuck and Company, and he did not buy into it on his own. In 1890 he married Augusta Nusbaum, called Gussie, and the marriage came with a brother. Aaron Nusbaum had made money operating the soda-water and refreshment concessions at the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition, and in 1895, when Richard Sears needed capital, it was Nusbaum who carried the deal to his new brother-in-law. The two men bought a half-interest in the company for $75,000. Rosenwald's share was $37,500 (~$1.5 million today), backed by friends and family, for a quarter of a business then selling roughly $750,000 of watches and dry goods a year by mail.

It was the door into everything, and Rosenwald walked through it on Nusbaum's invitation. Within six years he wanted Nusbaum gone. The two men could not run the company together. By 1901 the partnership had curdled into a standoff, and Rosenwald and Sears bought Nusbaum out for $1.25 million (~$46.5 million today), a sum that measured how much the business had grown in six years and how completely the two survivors intended to control what came next.

The money was the smaller cost. Aaron Nusbaum was Gussie's brother. The buyout settled the company and ruptured the family, and the rupture never healed. Rosenwald gained undivided command of the firm that would make him one of the richest men in America on the same day he made his wife's brother a permanent stranger across the dinner table. Control and heartbreak arrived as a single decision. He would spend the rest of his career structuring deals so that no one he brought in had to be forced out, and the instinct traces directly back to the brother-in-law he could not keep.

Richard Sears was a genius of the catalog page. He wrote copy that could sell a watch to a man who had no use for one, priced goods to undercut the country store, and grew sales by sheer promotional nerve. What he could not do was run the thing he had built. Orders piled up unfilled. Customers waited. The business threatened to die of its own popularity.

Rosenwald was the opposite man. He brought no vision and made no claim to one. What he brought was order. Working alongside Albert H. Loeb, the lawyer who became the company's vice-president, treasurer, and the indispensable second who ran the machine day to day, Rosenwald turned a promotional stunt into an industrial operation.

At the West Side plant at Homan Square, which opened in 1906, the operations superintendent Otto Doering designed a scheduled-shipping system that ran on a single rule: incoming merchandise must never cross or interrupt the path of merchandise going out. Chutes, conveyor belts, and escalators moved goods in one direction; nineteen cylinder presses turned out two million catalogs; orders dispatched within twenty-four hours. Employment ran from roughly eighty people in 1895 to about eight thousand by 1908. Sales went from $750,000 to roughly $50 million a year. Richard Sears resigned in 1908 over an advertising-budget dispute, and Rosenwald, already running the company in fact, succeeded him as president. The visionary left. The operator stayed. The machine he and Loeb had built kept running without the man whose name was on the door, which is the truest measure of what Rosenwald actually did: he made Richard Sears optional.

This is the first half of the Operator-Investor Pipeline, the pattern that recurs across Chicago's history in which an operator builds a machine, the machine throws off a fortune, and the fortune is redeployed into the next thing. Rosenwald was never the inventor. He was the man who made the invention pay, and being that man put a personal fortune within his reach that no copywriter's salary ever would.

The fortune itself arrived in one transaction, and it came from New York. In 1906, Sears needed capital to fund its growth, and Rosenwald went looking for a loan of perhaps $5 million (~$180 million today). He found Henry Goldman of Goldman Sachs, and Goldman did not offer a loan. He offered something stranger.

The conventional wisdom of 1906 valued a company by its hard assets, the things a bank could seize and sell. Sears had relatively few of those. What it had was velocity: a mail-order machine that turned inventory over with extraordinary speed and generated cash on every cycle. Goldman argued that the earning power of that velocity was itself the asset, and on that theory he took Sears public in a $40 million flotation (~$1.4 billion today), underwritten by a Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers syndicate. It was one of the first times an American retailer was valued on what it earned rather than what it owned, a valuation argument that would later become Wall Street orthodoxy.

What matters here is what Rosenwald walked away with. The 1906 offering put roughly $4.5 million in his pocket (~$160 million today). A clothier's son who had bought a quarter of a mail-order house for $37,500 eleven years earlier now held a personal fortune large enough to do anything he wanted with it. The question of what to do with it would occupy the rest of his life. The machine had done its work; the equity had become liquid; the operator had become an investor. What he chose to invest in was not another company.

First the machine nearly died, and saving it revealed exactly how Rosenwald thought about money. The post-war deflation of 1920 and 1921 caught Sears with roughly $105 million in inventory bought at wartime prices and collapsing in value. The company faced an operating loss of about $16 million (~$290 million today). Its stock fell from $243 a share to $54.50. For the first time, the business Rosenwald had spent a quarter-century disciplining was in danger of going under.

The rescue structure was Albert Loeb's idea, and Rosenwald executed it with his own fortune. He gave the company $5 million (~$90 million today) in 50,000 shares of his personal stock, stipulating that the shares not be sold below their $100 par value while the stock traded near $60. He bought the plant's land for $16 million (~$290 million today), putting $4 million down and securing the balance with a trust deed that carried no personal liability to the sellers but exposed him fully to the company's fate. The maneuver turned a projected $16 million deficit into a surplus of $1,745,607.

Then he did the part that revealed the man. He offered to buy, at par, the scrip of any employee who held fifty shares or fewer, and he guaranteed the bank loans that employees had taken out against their Sears stock. The small shareholders, the clerks and packers who had bet their savings on the company, were made whole first. C.W. Barron of the Boston News Bureau called it "business philanthropy" and "the chivalric answer." Bernard Baruch wrote to him: "Truly you are a noble chap. But it is really characteristic of you." The instinct on display was the same one that would define his giving: put your own capital at risk on terms that protect the smallest co-investor. In 1921 it pointed inward, at his own company. He was rehearsing a posture he would soon turn outward, toward the rest of the country.

Around 1911, Rosenwald met Booker T. Washington, the principal of Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, and joined the school's board of trustees. The meeting gave Rosenwald a mission, and it gave him a mechanism he recognized immediately, because it was the same one he used in business: never put up all the money.

The Rosenwald school program began with a handful of pilot buildings in 1912 and grew into one of the largest privately funded efforts in American educational history: roughly five thousand schools across 883 counties in fifteen Southern states, built for Black children in a region that refused to build for them. Each schoolhouse cost about $600 (~$21,000 today). Rosenwald put up roughly half. The rest had to be matched, and the matching was the entire point. Local Black communities contributed cash, land, labor, and materials; white school boards committed public funds and agreed to maintain the buildings as part of the public system. Washington described the design in his own words: "many people who cannot give money would give half a day or a day's work… nails, brick, lime." Rosenwald added fifty dollars per school for a traveling agent and let the communities carry the rest.

It was first-loss, blended-finance capital decades before anyone coined the terms. The grant was never a gift; it was a condition that mobilized far more capital than it contained, and it forced the people it helped to own what they built. The same mechanism ran through the rest of Rosenwald's giving: challenge grants that seeded Black YMCA and YWCA buildings in cities across the country, major backing for Jane Addams and Hull House, a trusteeship and steady support at the University of Chicago, and in 1929 the Michigan Boulevard Garden Apartments in Bronzeville, known as the Rosenwald Courts, a 421-unit housing venture that applied the same skin-in-the-game philosophy to where Chicago's Black migrants lived. Washington was the moral center of all of it, the man who turned a retailer's matching instinct into a mission.

The matching instinct outlived the program. Robert F. Smith, the investor who in 2019 paid off the student debt of an entire Morehouse College graduating class, now funds the Student Freedom Initiative, which finances Black STEM students at Tuskegee and other historically Black colleges through income-contingent terms rather than fixed loans, so that what they repay underwrites the students who come after them. It is the same idea Rosenwald and Washington worked out in a clapboard schoolhouse: capital structured as a condition that compounds forward, never a gift that simply ends.

On April 30, 1928, Rosenwald gave the Julius Rosenwald Fund an additional 200,000 shares of Sears stock, bringing its assets to roughly $20 million (~$380 million today), and in the same letter to his trustees he attached a clock. The Fund was to spend all of its principal and interest within twenty-five years of his death, and then cease to exist. He made the argument in public the following year, in the Saturday Evening Post in January 1929 and in The Atlantic Monthly that May. "I am opposed to gifts in perpetuity for any purpose," he wrote. He distrusted the dead hand of the founder reaching across generations to fund causes the founder could not foresee. "Coming generations," he wrote, "can be relied upon to provide for their own needs as they arise." He was equally clear-eyed about the difficulty of the task he had set: "I can testify that it is nearly always easier to make $1,000,000 honestly than to dispose of it wisely."

This is the Capital Lens that organizes his entire life, and it deserves a name: catalytic capital with a death date. Rosenwald treated his own money as a lever on other people's behavior rather than a sum to be granted. On the way in, nearly every dollar was a matching condition that forced beneficiaries to co-invest before his capital arrived. On the way out, he housed that capital inside an institution engineered to spend itself to zero within a generation rather than calcify into a perpetual bureaucracy. Forced co-investment on the entry; a built-in expiration on the exit. The schools program supplies the first half; the 1928 mandate supplies the second; the 1921 rescue proves the same instinct governed even how he saved his own company. It is the Operator-Investor Pipeline carried to its end point, where the redeployed fortune funds not the next company but the next generation. Underneath runs a strain of Family Business Legacy: the Hammerslough garment trade that gave a Springfield boy his entry, and the son, Lessing, who would inherit the chairman's seat even as the institution beneath it was built not to last.

He refused the monument that was his for the asking. When the Museum of Science and Industry was organized in 1926, Rosenwald pledged $3 million (~$54 million today) and, with his estate and family association, ultimately gave it roughly $11 million, and he declined to let it carry his name. He died at his Highland Park estate on January 6, 1932, at sixty-nine, and the twenty-five-year clock began to run. The Fund spent itself out and dissolved on schedule in 1948, having expended more than $22 million over its lifetime; across all his vehicles, Rosenwald gave away somewhere between $62 and $70 million in his life, a fortune deliberately scattered rather than enthroned.

His idea did not die with the Fund. In May 2025, the Gates Foundation announced that it would spend down more than $200 billion and close its doors by 2045, with Bill Gates committing to give away nearly all of his remaining wealth. "There are too many urgent problems to solve," Gates wrote, "for me to hold onto resources that could be used to help people," a sentence that lands a century after Rosenwald wrote that coming generations could be relied upon to provide for their own needs. There is no evidence Gates was thinking of a Chicago retailer when he wrote it. He did not have to be. The argument was right, and it took the largest foundation on earth ninety-seven years to adopt it at planetary scale.

Gates is not the only one, and some are holding to the deadline even more strictly. Warren Buffett, who for two decades planned to give his fortune away through Gates, instead rewrote his will so that at his death his three children must distribute the last 99.5% of his wealth by unanimous vote, leaving no foundation standing behind them. "Tomorrow's decisions are likely to be better made by three live and well-directed brains than by a dead hand," he wrote, the same distrust of the dead hand that had moved Rosenwald a century before. Chuck Feeney went furthest of all: he gave away the entire $8 billion endowment of Atlantic Philanthropies and signed the foundation out of existence in 2020, finishing in his lifetime the disappearing act Rosenwald's Fund completed in 1948.

The closer echo is in Chicago. Builders Vision, the roughly $15 billion platform that Lukas Walton founded in the West Loop in 2018, describes its work as "catalytic capital," deploying funds in ways that absorb risk and unlock opportunities for other investors, and it has directed more than $140 million to Chicago organizations. Walton is the heir to the Walmart fortune, the retail empire that finally overtook the one Rosenwald built, and he chose to base his giving in Chicago rather than Bentonville or the Bay Area. The cause is different and the language is newer. The structure is the one a clothier's son worked out in a schoolhouse in Alabama: make your capital a condition, never a gift, and never let it sit still long enough to become a monument.